El estudio sociológico de la ciencia y la religión en contexto
Resumen
Este artículo reflexiona sobre algunas cuestiones interdisciplinarias, históricas y filosóficas que es necesario considerar al realizar el estudio social de la ciencia y la religión en su contexto histórico, social y cultural. En primer lugar, se argumenta a favor del alejamiento del supuesto conflicto implícito entre ciencia y religión para abrazar una tesis de la complejidad que permita advertir los matices de la interacción entre estos dos conceptos como parte de la experiencia vivida de los individuos o de identidades sociales, grupales o culturales. Seguidamente, se señala la necesidad de una meta-reflexividad para hacer conscientes las limitaciones y los supuestos de las disciplinas de las ciencias sociales o humanidades que pueden distorsionar la comprensión de las actitudes del público hacia la ciencia y la religión. Por último, se advierten las restricciones de los métodos cuantitativos -que han dominado el estudio social de las relaciones entre ciencia y religión- para evidenciar la necesidad de modelos cualitativos, más contextuales, acerca de las posiciones de los individuos o de los grupos dentro de los contextos geopolíticos, culturales y sociales y que llevan a que las cuestiones científicas actúen como un marcador de identidad en un espectro de públicos religiosos, espirituales, no religiosos y ateos.
http://id.caicyt.gov.ar/ark:/s18537081/c1wirxhap
Palabras clave
Citas
Barbour, I.G. (1990). Religion in an age of science: The Gifford lectures 1989–1991 (vol 1), London: SCM.
Barbour, I.G. (1997). Religion and science: Historical and contemporary issues, San Francisco: Harper San Francisco.
Bauer, M.W., Allum, N. y Miller, S. (2007). What can we learn from 25 years of PUS survey research? Liberating and expanding the agenda’, Public Understanding of Science, 16(1): 79–95.
Brooke, J.H. (1991). Science and religion: Some historical perspectives, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cantor, G. y Kenny, C. (2001). Barbour’s fourfold way: problems with his taxonomy of science–religion relationships, Zygon; Journal of Religion and Science, 36(4): 765–81.
Carlisle, J. et al. (2019). “Muslim Perceptions of Biological Evolution: A Critical Review of Quantitative and Qualitative Research”. En Jones, S. H; Kaden, T. y Catto, R. (ed.). Science, Belief and Society: International Perspectives on Religion, Non-Religion and the Public Understanding of Science. Bristiol: . Bristol University Press.
Coyne, J. (2015). Faith vs. fact: Why science and religion are incompatible, New York: Penguin Random House LLC.
Draper, J.W. (1874). History of the conflict between religion and science, New York, NY, and London: D. Appleton and Company.
Durkheim, E. (2001 [1912]). Elementary forms of the religious life, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ecklund, E.H. y Scheitle, C.P. (2018). Religion vs. science: What religious people really think, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Elsdon-Baker, F. (2015). Creating creationists: the influence of “issues framing” on our understanding of public perceptions of clash narratives between evolutionary science and belief , Public Understanding of Science, 24(4): 422–39.
Elsdon-Baker, F. (2017, 5 de septiembre). Questioning evolution is neither science denial nor the preserve of creationists, The Guardian.
Elsdon-Baker, F. (2018). “Re-examining “creationist” monsters in the uncharted waters of the social study of science and religion”. En B. Nerlich, S. Hartley, S. Raman y A. Smith (eds). Science and the politics of openness: Here be monsters (258–77), Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Elsdon-Baker, F. (en prensa). “Creating hardline “secular” evolutionists: the influence of question design on our understanding of public perceptions of clash narratives between evolutionary science and belief”. En F. Elsdon-Baker and B. Lightman (eds). Science and religion: Exploring the spectrum, Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
Evans, J. (2018). Morals not knowledge: Recasting the contemporary U.S. conflict between religion and science, Berkeley: University of California Press.
Evans, J.H. y Evans, M.S. (2008). Religion and science: beyond the epistemological conflict narrative, Annual Review of Sociology, 34: 87–105.
Fleck, L. (1935). The genesis and development of a scientific fact, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Gould, S.J. (1999). Rock of ages: Science and religion in the fullness of life, New York: Penguin Random House LLC.
Harrison, P. (2015). The territories of science and religion, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Hill, J.P. (2014). Rejecting evolution: the role of religion, education, and social networks, Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 53(3): 575–94.
Hill, J.P. (2019). “Survey-based Research on Science and Religion: A Review and Critique“. En Jones, S. H; Kaden, T. y Catto, R. (ed.). Science, Belief and Society: International Perspectives on Religion, Non-Religion and the Public Understanding of Science. Bristiol: . Bristol University Press.
Jones, S. H; Kaden, T. y Catto, R. (ed.) (2019). Science, Belief and Society: International Perspectives on Religion, Non-Religion and the Public Understanding of Science. Bristiol: . Bristol University Press.
Jones, S., Catto, R., Kaden, T. y Elsdon-Baker, F. (2019). “That is how Muslims are required to view the world”: race, culture and belief in non-Muslims’ descriptions of Islam and science, The Sociological Review, 67(1): 161–77.
Kaden, T. et al. (2019). “Language, Labels and Lived Identity in Debates about Science, Religion and Belief“ En Jones, S. H; Kaden, T. y Catto, R. (ed.). Science, Belief and Society: International Perspectives on Religion, Non-Religion and the Public Understanding of Science. Bristiol: . Bristol University Press.
Kind, S. (2019). “Avoiding the ‘Anti-intellectual Abyss’: How Secular Humanists in Sweden try to Define the Boundaries between Science, Religion, Pseudoscience and Postmodernism“. En Jones, S. H; Kaden, T. y Catto, R. (ed.). Science, Belief and Society: International Perspectives on Religion, Non-Religion and the Public Understanding of Science. Bristiol: . Bristol University Press.
Kuhn, T. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Lightman, B., Nickerson, S. y Tajbakhsh, P. (en prensa). “From conflict to complexity: historians and 19th century public perceptions of science and religion”. En F. Elsdon-Baker y B. Lightman (eds). Science and religion: Exploring the spectrum, Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
Marx, K. (1970 [1843]), “Critique of Hegel’s philosophy of right”. En J. O’Malley (de). Marx: Early political writings, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Miller, J.D. (1983). Scientific literacy: a conceptual and empirical review, Daedalus, 112(2): 29–48.
Miller, J.D. (2010). “The conceptualisation and measurement of civic scientific literacy for the twenty-first century”. En J. Meinwald y J.G. Hildebrand (eds). Science and the educated American: A core component of liberal education (241–55), Cambridge: American Academy of Arts and Sciences.
Miller, S. (2001). Public understanding of science at the crossroads,Public Understanding of Science, 10(1): 115–20.
Noy, S. y O’Brien, T.L. (2018). An intersectional analysis of perspectives on science and religion in the United States, The Sociological Quarterly, 59(1): 40–61.
Numbers, R. (ed.) (2009). Galileo goes to jail and other myths about science and religion, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Reid, L. (2019). “Researching Clergy Attitudes towards Science: A Reflective Account of Key Methodological Challenges“. En Jones, S. H; Kaden, T. y Catto, R. (ed.). Science, Belief and Society: International Perspectives on Religion, Non-Religion and the Public Understanding of Science. Bristiol: . Bristol University Press.
Sharp, S. y Leicht, C. (en prensa). “Beyond belief systems: promoting a social identity approach to the study of science and religion”. En F. Elsdon-Baker and B. Lightman (eds). Science and religion: Exploring the spectrum, Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
Sturgis, P. y Allum, N. (2004). Science in society: re-evaluating the deficit model of public attitudes, Public Understanding of Science, 13(1): 55–74.
Unsworth, A. (2019). “Discourses on Science and Islam: A View from Britain”. En Jones, Stephen H; Kaden, Tom y Catto, Rebecca (ed.) (2019) Science, Belief and Society: International Perspectives on Religion, Non-Religion and the Public Understanding of Science (pp. 3–24). Bristol University Press.
Weber, M. (2002 [1905]). The protestant ethic and the spirit of capitalism, New York: Penguin.
White, A.D. (2009 [1896]). A history of the warfare of science with theology in Christendom, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Refbacks
- No hay Refbacks actualmente.
Sociedad y Religión ISSN 1853-7081
Licencia Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0 Internacional
